Critical Thinking - Prompt Engineering
A prompt is the human-created input an AI model uses to generate an output.
Integrating prompt engineering techniques when using an AI chatbot tool (such as ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Gemeni, etc.) can improve outputs because well-crafted prompts yield more accurate, relevant, and useful AI-generated responses. As a bonus, writing effective prompts requires clarity, specificity, and an understanding of how AI processes language, which strengthens your critical thinking, analytical, and communication skills. It must be stated, however, that the discourse about the effectiveness of prompt engineering, like AI technology itself, is rapidly changing to the point that some question the future usefulness of prompt engineering.
When teaching prompt engineering skills, best practices suggest there are a few components to a prompt deemed somewhere between essential (TASK) and important but not mandatory (PERSONA, FORMAT, TONE).
Task: What you want the AI chatbot to do
Context: Give the chatbot enough information to constratin the endless possible responses)
Example(s): Including a relevant example greatly improves the quality of the output.
Useful, NOT mandatory:
- Persona: Give the AI a role to embody for more specific results, but remember that it helps if the persona is someone well-known.
- Format: Visualize what you want the chatbot to create; bullet points, charts, graphs, paragraphs, etc? Give it instructions to limit the options.
- Tone: Options could include casual, formal, pessimistic, etc. You could select a 'feeling,' prompt the chatbot for possible tone keywords you might choose from, or check out this table of tone descriptors at the bottom of the page.
Another example of a prompt engineering framework often referenced in LIS circles includes the acronym CLEAR (Concise, Logical, Explicit, Adaptive, Reflective), popularized by Lo, L. S. (2023). The CLEAR path: A framework for enhancing information literacy through prompt engineering. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102720